<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://conversationamongfriends.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Conversation Among Friends - faith - Comments</title>
 <link>http://conversationamongfriends.org/taxonomy/term/23</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;faith&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Polkinghorne</title>
 <link>http://conversationamongfriends.org/are-most-scientists-atheists-or-agnostics-rather-b#comment-353</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
While on vacation, I have read much of John Polkinghorne&amp;#39;s book &amp;quot;The Faith of a Physicist&amp;quot;, from his 1993-1994 Gifford lectures at Edinburgh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Polkinghorne, at publication, was President of Queen&amp;#39;s College, Cambridge and Fellow of the Royal Society.  A former Professor of Mathematical Physics, he is also an ordained priest in the Church of England. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While an Anglican, Polkinghorne takes full advantage of the well-vetted and time tested Nicene Creed in naming his chapters and evaluating Christian faith in light of the conjectures of modern physics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I would say there are a few gems here but the reading is not for those seeking a quick and light diversion.  I certainly would not recommend it for vacation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
js 
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:10:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 353 at http://conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>faith is an act of the will...</title>
 <link>http://conversationamongfriends.org/religion-beat-became-test-faith#comment-195</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
i assume there&amp;#39;s a level of stress where pretty much everyone&amp;#39;s faith crumbles, and i hope i never get to that point again. having said that, i believe that faith is essentially an act of the will. feelings do not much enter the equation - they do so only insofar as they dispose one towards or against faith.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
so, whether i feel inspired and fully of fuzzy warm love one day or down and crabby the next, what counts is my will to do right or wrong, to have faith or to have not faith. and faith, to me, is the will to submit to the god who&amp;#39;s love, nonwithstanding doubt and uncertainty. otherwise, people with a naturally high serotonin level would all be predestined to be saints, and guys with not enough of the same would summarily go the other way. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
feelings are useful, but i don&amp;#39;t believe the path to sainthood is paved with euphoria... interestingly, the author says he read the &amp;quot;Dark night of the soul&amp;quot;. i would have thought that this states the case adequately. maybe not. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
as for the church being proactive in preventing this kind of thing: i think both i and Joey can attest to the fact that the level of caution in the church we know (we may not know its darker sides) is fairly imposing. even the confessional in our church is made of glass, and classes on how to spot child predators are offered by the parishes. but, alas, where there are people, there is corruption. we are, after all, a fallen face...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ok, i&amp;#39;m off my soapbox now &lt;img src=&quot;/modules/smileys/packs/example/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:35:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 195 at http://conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Religion beat</title>
 <link>http://conversationamongfriends.org/religion-beat-became-test-faith#comment-194</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Jonathan, 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Very interesting article.  Each of us has a journey.  As for me I was &amp;quot;scortched&amp;quot; by a cult for 20 years before returning to my faith. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have since decided that no man or his behavior will come between me and God.  I refuse to be influenced by the sinful regarding the nature of the Creator.  I feel dumb for letting this happen to me in the past. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is where Lobdell flaters, IMHO.  He looks for good in people as evidence for God&amp;#39;s existence. This approach is not fool-proof. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What he didn&amp;#39;t do was &amp;quot;seek first the truth&amp;quot;.  Once you find the truth you will find that there is much work to do in both the Church and the World.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
js 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:20:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 194 at http://conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Collins &amp; C.S. Lewis</title>
 <link>http://conversationamongfriends.org/francis-collins#comment-29</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like Collins took a look at C.S. Lewis and G.K. Chesterson for a deductive analysis of Christ.  This is the proposition that Jesus of Nazareth is either a Liar, a Lunatic, or Lord.  This argument by C.S. Lewis is very good but I did not find it to be absolutely &amp;quot;water tight&amp;quot; - however, I did find the reading (Mere Christanity) to be similar to a good steep hike and I was moving too quickly to be absolutely fair to Lewis - a good challenge and really a piece of argumentation that is scholarly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Glad to discuss it with another reader.  - Joey&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:58:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 29 at http://conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
